Thursday, February 20, 2014

Why I Hate My Gaps in Historical Knowledge

One of the things that struck me reading Homage to Catalonia is how much I didn’t know about the Spanish Civil War, and how much having that knowledge really informs a text that is taking place within narrative’s present tense. When I originally began reading the story I skipped the introduction, as I always seem to do, because I find they sometimes give an analytical reading of the entire narrative that may give away developments I don’t want spoiled. However, after having read the opening chapters of Homage to Catalonia I thought there would be something within the introduction that would give me some grounding to the situation that Orwell found himself in when he joined the militia. Thankfully it was there and I chided myself for thinking that a nonfiction introduction would work in the same way as the introduction to a fictional work.

With that understanding, going back and rereading the opening chapters, while a little more informed, still left me, for some reason, unable to be completely grounded while reading the text. Perhaps I expected more of a straightforward chronology of the war, as opposed to Orwell’s limited view and opining of what was going on around his area specifically.


  That being said, while reading the memoir, I was still able to be caught up in Orwell’s shifting views of the conflict that he had become a part of. His realizations that this war was not like the ones he had expected and how the lack of organization and shifting allegiances/goals of the politics were dismaying were fascinating to read. I think upon reading a more straight forward history of the war, being able to have a more concrete understanding of where this specific memoir exists in the larger frame of the conflict and then returning to read it again is something I’ll have to do, to fill in those gaps I’m disappointed in myself for having.

No comments:

Post a Comment